Colorado ballot measure · November 3, 2026

Colorado Proposition 132, explained

Higher penalties for fentanyl crimes. A ballot measure is a yes-or-no question put directly to voters — no candidate is involved, and the wording on the ballot is the wording that becomes law. This page shows that wording first, then what it actually changes.

The official wording

Shall there be a change to the Colorado Revised Statutes concerning criminal penalties for fentanyl and certain synthetic opioids, and, in connection therewith, increasing the felony classifications of drug-related crimes for distribution, manufacturing, dispensing, sale, or possession of fentanyl and certain synthetic opioids; creating mandated treatment for certain drug felony violations based on possession amount; and changing sentencing provisions to narrow or eliminate exemptions for crimes related to fentanyl and certain synthetic opioids and drug-related deaths?

This is what appears on the ballot. Everything below explains it.

What it actually means

Makes possessing any amount of fentanyl or similar synthetic opioids a felony and requires a prison sentence of 8 to 32 years for distributing any amount. It removes several options judges now have to reduce penalties, such as for people who did not know a drug contained fentanyl or who called for help during an overdose.

If you vote YES

Distributing, selling, transferring or sharing any amount of a substance containing fentanyl would carry a mandatory 8 to 32 years in prison; today that range applies mainly to more than 50 grams, distribution to a minor, or distribution causing death.
Possessing any amount would be a felony; possession of 1 to 4 grams could bring 2 to 4 years in prison, and possession under 1 gram up to 1 year, reducible to a misdemeanor only after completing court-ordered treatment.
"Good Samaritan" reductions for people who report an overdose would end for distribution cases, and judges could no longer consider whether a person reasonably believed a substance did not contain fentanyl.
State spending would rise by $0.9 million in the first year, $8.9 million in the second and $68.2 million by year five, mostly for prisons, and additional prison space may be needed.

If you vote NO

Possession of under 1 gram would stay a misdemeanor with no prison time for most offenders, and treatment and probation options would remain.
Distribution penalties would stay tiered by weight: possible 2 to 4 years under 4 grams, possible 4 to 8 years for 4 to 50 grams, and mandatory 8 to 32 years above 50 grams or in aggravated cases.
Judges would keep discretion to weigh circumstances such as awareness of fentanyl, criminal history and Good Samaritan actions.

The numbers that matter

State spending, year 2: $8.9 million
State spending, year 5: $68.2 million
Mandatory sentence for any distribution: 8 to 32 years

Why supporters say YES

Fentanyl is uniquely deadly and warrants stronger penalties; mandatory prison for dealers keeps them off the street, gives victims' families a sense of justice, and may deter use and reduce overdose deaths.
— Colorado Blue Book argument for Proposition 132 (Legislative Council Staff)

Why opponents say NO

The measure is unlikely to reduce use, crime or overdoses; fear of prison could discourage people from seeking treatment or calling for help, it treats people sharing trace amounts as major dealers, and it shifts money to an overcrowded prison system.
— Colorado Blue Book argument against Proposition 132 (Legislative Council Staff)

What’s genuinely uncertain

Because penalties depend on the weight of any mixture containing fentanyl, not the fentanyl itself, the number of people facing mandatory prison is hard to predict.
Long-term prison costs would keep growing beyond year five and depend on prosecution and sentencing patterns.
The measure is sponsored by Advance Colorado, according to Colorado Newsline; no registered opposition committee was identified in the sources reviewed.

The bottom line

Tougher, more certain punishment for fentanyl dealing and possession, against rising prison costs and less judicial discretion over low-level and overdose-related cases.

One neutral sentence describing the tradeoff — not a recommendation.

Sources:leg.colorado.gov coloradosos.gov coloradonewsline.com

Checking it against the official text

The Colorado Secretary of State publishes the certified measures and, in most states, an official voter guide with fiscal notes. That is the authoritative version. Everything here is an explanation of it, not a substitute for it.

Confirm this with the official source

Your ballot is determined by your election authority, not by us. Verify your registration, precinct, and sample ballot at Colorado Secretary of State.

Other measures on the Colorado ballot

Candidates on the same ballot

Everything on the Colorado ballot →