Arizona ballot measure · November 3, 2026

Arizona Proposition 144, explained

Government ID for all voters and other election changes. A ballot measure is a yes-or-no question put directly to voters — no candidate is involved, and the wording on the ballot is the wording that becomes law. This page shows that wording first, then what it actually changes.

The official wording

REQUIRES ALL VOTERS, INCLUDING VOTERS WHO VOTE BY MAIL, TO SHOW GOVERNMENT-ISSUED ID TO VOTE IN EACH ELECTION; MAKES OTHER CHANGES TO ELECTION ADMINISTRATION AND CAMPAIGN FINANCE PROHIBITIONS. A "yes" vote shall have the effect of amending the Arizona Constitution to: (1) require voters to show proof of identity when voting in each election, including when voting by mail; (2) changing existing proof of identity requirements to limit acceptable documentation to government-issued ID; (3) require election officials to provide all voters the option to have their ballot tabulated at their voting location on election day; (4) prohibit foreign nationals from contributing or spending to influence elections in Arizona and prohibit anyone from knowingly accepting such contributions, similar to prohibitions that already exist in federal law; (5) create a new standard for judicial review of election laws under the Arizona Constitution, which may make it harder to challenge election laws; and (6) require the legislature to appropriate money necessary to implement these provisions. A "no" vote shall have the effect of maintaining current constitutional provisions governing elections.

This is what appears on the ballot. Everything below explains it.

What it actually means

Adds to the Arizona Constitution a requirement that every voter, including mail voters, show government-issued ID in each election, as set by law. It also affirms citizen-only voting, guarantees an option to have ballots tabulated at the voting location on Election Day, bans foreign spending on Arizona elections, and makes election laws easier to defend in court. It would apply from January 1, 2028.

If you vote YES

Voters would have to present valid government-issued proof of identity before casting a ballot in each election, including by mail, with details set by law.
Acceptable proof of identity would be limited to government-issued ID.
All voters would have the option to have their ballot tabulated at their voting location on Election Day.
Foreign nationals could not contribute or spend to influence Arizona elections, including ballot measures, and no one could knowingly accept such money.
Election laws, including on early and mail voting, would be upheld if rationally connected to legitimate interests such as timely results, security and public confidence, which the official ballot language says may make them harder to challenge.
The Legislature would have to fund implementation; the provisions would apply to elections from January 1, 2028.

If you vote NO

Current constitutional provisions would remain; existing state law on voter identification would continue.
Mail ballots would continue to be verified by comparing envelope signatures with voter records, with counties contacting voters to fix problems.
Election laws would continue to be reviewed by courts under existing constitutional standards.

The numbers that matter

Takes effect for elections on or after: January 1, 2028
Vote needed: Simple majority
Share of voters using early ballots: About 80%

Why supporters say YES

Only citizens should vote, every voter should show government ID, foreign money should be banned from Arizona elections, and on-site tabulation would end long waits for results; these steps are supported across parties.
— Official argument for, by Representative Alexander Kolodin, sponsor
A loophole lets foreign nationals fund Arizona ballot measures, which a Swiss billionaire used to put more than $1 million into an initiative; the measure also strengthens voter ID and speeds results.
— Official argument for, by Nathan Duell, Arizona State Director, Heritage Action for America

Why opponents say NO

Arizona's mail system already verifies signatures and lets voters fix problems; adding ID paperwork for mail ballots would make early and mail voting harder, especially for older, disabled, rural and low-income voters.
— Official argument against, by Will Humble, Executive Director, Arizona Public Health Association
Vague requirements to include identification with early ballots could expose voters' personal information, cause inconsistent processing and litigation, and lead to eligible votes being thrown out.
— Official argument against, by Jennifer Guzman, State Director, Common Cause Arizona

What’s genuinely uncertain

The specific ID requirements for mail voters would be set later by law, so how burdensome they are cannot yet be judged.
Some opponents argue the measure would affect dropping off early ballots on Election Day, used by about 264,000 voters in 2024; the official ballot language and Legislative Council analysis do not describe eliminating drop-off.
Implementation costs are not estimated; the measure requires the Legislature to appropriate whatever is necessary.
Representative Kolodin, the sponsor, is a candidate for Secretary of State in 2026.

The bottom line

A uniform ID check on every ballot and faster election-night results, against new requirements for mail voters and election laws that are harder to challenge.

One neutral sentence describing the tradeoff — not a recommendation.

Sources:azsos.gov apps.azsos.gov apps.azsos.gov azleg.gov

Checking it against the official text

The Arizona Secretary of State publishes the certified measures and, in most states, an official voter guide with fiscal notes. That is the authoritative version. Everything here is an explanation of it, not a substitute for it.

Confirm this with the official source

Your ballot is determined by your election authority, not by us. Verify your registration, precinct, and sample ballot at Arizona Secretary of State.

Other measures on the Arizona ballot

Candidates on the same ballot

Everything on the Arizona ballot →