Skip to content
Ballot Explained

Louisiana ballot measure · November 3, 2026

Louisiana Amendment 8, explained

Barring foreign adversaries from expropriating property. A ballot measure is a yes-or-no question put directly to voters — no candidate is involved, and the wording on the ballot is the wording that becomes law. This page shows that wording first, then what it actually changes.

The official wording

Do you support an amendment to prohibit expropriation of property by a foreign adversary or an agent of a foreign adversary? (Amends Article I, Section 4(B)(4))

This is what appears on the ballot. Everything below explains it.

What it actually means

Louisiana lets certain private companies — pipelines and utilities, for example — expropriate land for a public and necessary purpose, with compensation and a court check. This amendment would say that a private entity that is a foreign adversary, or an agent of one, cannot use that power. State law defines foreign adversary by reference to a federal list that includes China, Cuba, Iran, North Korea, Russia and Venezuela under Nicolás Maduro.

Y

If you vote YES

  • Article I, Section 4(B)(4) would bar any private entity that is a foreign adversary, or an agent of a foreign adversary as defined by law, from expropriating or damaging property in Louisiana.
  • The existing requirements on private expropriation would stay: a public and necessary purpose, just compensation, and a judicial determination of whether the purpose is public and necessary.
  • "Foreign adversary" would carry the definition in state law, which tracks the federal list at 15 CFR 7.4.
  • Because the list is set by law rather than by the amendment, which countries and entities are covered could change without another vote of the people.
N

If you vote NO

  • No new constitutional prohibition would be added; private expropriation would continue to be governed by the public-and-necessary-purpose test, compensation and judicial review.
  • Louisiana's post-Kelo restrictions on eminent domain for economic development would remain as they are.
  • Nothing in current law expressly addresses whether a foreign-adversary-controlled entity may exercise expropriation power.

Why supporters say YES

We found none published in the sources reviewed.

Why opponents say NO

We found none published in the sources reviewed.

What’s genuinely uncertain

  • No committee has registered on either side and Ballotpedia has located no campaign in opposition, so no arguments are presented. The sponsor, Rep. Charles Owen (R-30), said the amendment "would allow citizens, if they want to cordon off their property [to prevent] any possibility of a foreign adversary ever expropriating it."
  • The Power Coalition's guide notes that because expropriation by foreign adversaries is uncommon, the practical impact may be limited unless such situations arise, and that the prohibition can reach a company that is only partly foreign-owned or controlled.
  • The amendment passed unanimously: 100-0 in the House and 36-0 in the Senate. No fiscal note was located.

The bottom line

Whether to write into the Declaration of Rights that an entity tied to a foreign adversary can never use Louisiana's private expropriation power — a guard against something that has not happened, with the list of covered countries set by ordinary law.

One neutral sentence describing the tradeoff — not a recommendation.

Checking it against the official text

The Louisiana Secretary of State publishes the certified measures and, in most states, an official voter guide with fiscal notes. That is the authoritative version. Everything here is an explanation of it, not a substitute for it.

Confirm this with the official source

Your ballot is determined by your election authority, not by us. Verify your registration, precinct, and sample ballot at Louisiana Secretary of State.

Other measures on the Louisiana ballot

Candidates on the same ballot

Everything on the Louisiana ballot →

Related reading