What they say they stand for
Their own words. Claims, not verified facts.
- Judicial restraint: in her words, "we should not be deciding things we don't have to decide."
- That "Montanans are entitled to fair, impartial, nonpartisan justice."
- Keeping political parties out of judicial campaigns; she has declined to attend party events or meet with party leaders.
- Skepticism of the phrase "judicial activism," which she describes as "primarily a pejorative term used by someone who doesn't like the result."
What they’ve actually done
Documented record from official sources.
- District court judge, Flathead County, Montana.
- Placed first in the June 2, 2026 nonpartisan primary with 140,131 votes (51.40%).
- Has publicly criticised a recently enacted Montana law permitting political parties to contribute directly to judicial candidates.
- Has declined invitations to political party events and meetings with party leaders during the campaign.
- Endorsed by Montana Conservation Voters.
Arguments in favor
We found none published about this candidate in the sources reviewed.
Arguments against
We found none published about this candidate in the sources reviewed.
What we couldn’t verify
- No published criticism of Eddy by name was found. Searched: Montana Republican Party material, the Wilson campaign, Montana Public Radio, Daily Montanan, Montana Free Press, KTVH and the Flathead Beacon.
- Montana does not run an official judicial performance evaluation commission, and no State Bar of Montana rating of the candidates was found.
- No independent analysis of Eddy's rulings as a district judge was found.
Sources (4)⌄
- 1Concerns over partisanship, 'judicial activism' shape Montana Supreme Court race — Montana Public Radio — mtpr.org
- 2Amy Eddy — 2026 Montana Election Guide, Montana Free Press — projects.montanafreepress.org
- 32026 Montana Supreme Court election — Wikipedia — en.wikipedia.org
- 4Montana GOP financially backs Wilson for SupCo, opposes nonpartisan judicial elections — Daily Montanan — dailymontanan.com