What they say they stand for
Their own words. Claims, not verified facts.
- Defending and building on the Affordable Care Act.
- Experienced leadership in the Democratic effort to retake the House majority.
- Federal investment in Sacramento infrastructure and flood protection.
- Opposition to the current administration's immigration enforcement practices.
What they’ve actually done
Documented record from official sources.
- U.S. Representative for Sacramento since March 2005, elected in a special election to succeed Robert Matsui.
- Ten terms served; would be an eleventh if re-elected.
- Turned 82 in September 2026.
- Finished second in the June 2, 2026 primary with about 29%, roughly two points behind Vang.
- Took part in a general election debate with Vang covering immigration, ICE activity, health care and foreign policy.
Arguments in favor
Congress runs on seniority and relationships, and a district loses real influence when it trades two decades of standing for a first-term member: "You need to have experienced people who are leading the charge."
— Doris Matsui, in the general election debate
Her opponent has little to show for ten years in local office, and swapping accomplishment for novelty is a bad trade for Sacramento.
— Steve Maviglio, political consultant and former press secretary to Governor Gray Davis, in a Sacramento Bee opinion piece
Arguments against
She is an established politician who helped create the conditions the district is living with now, and it is time for the next generation to take the seat.
— Mai Vang, her opponent
She has not been aggressive enough in opposing the administration's immigration policies, and her campaign finances rely on the kind of money her opponent refuses.
— Mai Vang's campaign
What we couldn’t verify
- A separate campaign website for the general election could not be confirmed; her positions here come from debate coverage and reporting.
- Her committee assignments and specific legislative priorities for a new term were not set out in the coverage available.
- Her direct answer to the age question, which she has largely addressed by pointing to experience rather than engaging it.