What they say they stand for
Their own words. Claims, not verified facts.
- Lowering costs for Valley households, which he names as the top issue in the district.
- Lowering PG&E rates.
- Stopping construction of the Delta Tunnel.
- Protecting health care access.
- Federal investment in Valley jobs and in water infrastructure.
- Government accountability, including what he calls corruption in the current administration.
What they’ve actually done
Documented record from official sources.
- U.S. Representative since January 2019; has represented the 9th District since 2023 and the 10th before that.
- Member of the House Appropriations Committee.
- Re-elected in 2024 by 3.6 points over then-Stockton mayor Kevin Lincoln, after winning by about 10 points in 2022.
- Describes himself as one of the most independent members of Congress and says he is not afraid to call out his own party.
- Named a target by the National Republican Congressional Committee for 2026.
- Led the June 2, 2026 primary field.
Arguments in favor
He sits on the Appropriations Committee and has used it on the Valley's own problems — PG&E rates, water infrastructure and stopping the Delta Tunnel — rather than on national fights.
— Josh Harder's campaign
He calls himself one of the most independent members of Congress and says he is not afraid to call out his own party, which is how he has held a seat that has moved toward Republicans.
— Josh Harder, in an interview with Stocktonia
Arguments against
He voted against the rural health fund that has since sent California more than $233 million: "Josh Harder did everything he could to prevent healthcare improvements for working families in California."
— National Republican Congressional Committee
His campaign is built on opposing the president rather than on the district: "When your whole motivation to run is Trump bad and not really offering any ideas" to improve the community — and California's gas prices come from state policy, not from Washington.
— John McBride, his opponent, in an interview with Stocktonia
What we couldn’t verify
- His position on the SAVE Act voter identification proposal his opponent supports, beyond the votes the NRCC cites.
- His response to the rural health fund vote characterisation has not been published in the material found.
- His explanation of how the Appropriations seat has translated into specific district funding was not set out in the coverage available.